disproportionate punishments as human dignity violating punishments

نویسندگان

اسمعیل رحیمی نژاد

محمد جعفر حبیب زاده

چکیده

disproportionate punishments are punishments passed or enforced without considering the criteria of proportionality, namely the criteria of harm done, the absolute or relative seriousness of crimes, the kind of committed crime and offender characteristics, the degree and kind of victim culpability. considering the penological aims, such as retribution, rehabilitation, deterrence and securing social defense, as a part of proportionality tests, is contrary to the rationale of proportionality. the main cause of the prohibition of disproportionate punishments in the international, and, national human rights' documents is the proscription of using human being as a means to an end aiming at the heart of human dignity. in iranian legal system, there are no clear rules and regulations about the prohibition of this kind of punishments and the determined punishments in many penal codes, aren't compatible with the standards of proportionality. this article explores the principal criteria of proportionality, the concept of disproportionate punishments an their contraction with human dignity.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

disproportionate punishments as violation of human dignity

disproportionate punishments are those punishments passed or enforced without considering the criteria of proportionality, namely the criteria of harm done, the absolute or relative seriousness of crimes, the kind of committed crime and offender characteristics, the degree and kind of victim’s culpability. considering the penological aims, such as retribution, deterrence and securing social def...

متن کامل

Rewards and Punishments as Selective Incentives AN APEX GAME

Apex games place weak players in the formal equivalent of a multiperson prisoner's dilemma in which each weak player must choose between competing against the other weak players for the opportunity to coalesce with the strong player or cooperating with the other weak players to produce a jointly preferable outcome. Punishments, not rewards, are predicted to be effective for enforcing cooperatio...

متن کامل

Self-Enforcing Cooperation with Graduated Punishments∗

Case studies of self-enforcing cooperation in repeated interactions usually find that the punishments inflicted on deviators are mild to start with, and increase only if there is evidence of persistent deviation. We model this using a combination of imperfect monitoring and asymmetric information in a one-sided prisoner’s dilemma. Call the player with the temptation to cheat player B, and the o...

متن کامل

The academic plagiarism and its punishments - a review

Currently there is an increase in the occurrence of plagiarism in varied types of academic texts. Therefore, in agreement with the Brazilian Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) policies, Brazilian higher education institutions should establish guidelines for the detection and inhibition of academic plagiarism. However, the notion of plagiarism is extremely complex,...

متن کامل

Teaching with Rewards and Punishments: Reinforcement or Communication?

Teaching with evaluative feedback involves expectations about how a learner will interpret rewards and punishments. We formalize two hypotheses of how a teacher implicitly expects a learner to interpret feedback – a reward-maximizing model based on standard reinforcement learning and an action-feedback model based on research on communicative intent – and describe a virtual animal-training task...

متن کامل

میزبانی شده توسط پلتفرم ابری doprax.com

copyright © 2015-2023